3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
___/3 |
Wrote thoughtful, creative, well-worded specific questions that were relevant to the assigned topic. |
Wrote well-worded, specific questions that were relevant to the assigned topic. |
Wrote questions which lacked focus, were poorly stated, and were not entirely relevant to the assigned topic. |
Wrote questions which lacked a specific focus, were poorly stated, and not relevant to the assigned topic. |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points
|
___/3 |
Identified highly appropriate sources in a variety of formats (books, journals, electronic sources). |
Identified mostly appropriate sources in a variety of formats (books, journals, electronic sources). |
Identified a few appropriate sources but made little attempt to balance format types. |
Identified no appropriate sources in any format. |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
___/3 |
Extracted relevant information. |
Extracted mostly relevant information. |
Extracted a lot of information which wasn’t relevant. |
Extracted irrelevant information. |
Brainstormed keywords, categories, related terms that were effective in researching the questions. |
Selected mostly effective keywords to use in researching the questions. |
Selected some keywords that were not effective in researching the questions. |
Selected no effective keywords to use in researching the questions. |
Wrote notes including succinct key facts which directly answered all of the research questions and were written in the student's own words. |
Wrote notes which included facts that answered most of the research questions and were written in the student’s own words. |
Wrote notes which included irrelevant facts which did not answer the research questions. Some notes were copied directly from the original source. |
Wrote notes which included a majority of facts which did not answer the research questions. Most or all notes were copied word-for-word from the original source. |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
___/3 |
Presented content clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and effective supporting evidence. |
Presented most of the content with a logical progression of ideas and supporting evidence. |
Presented content which failed to maintain a consistent focus, showed minimal organization and effort, and lacked an adequate amount of supporting evidence. |
Presented content which was unfocused, poorly organized, showed little thought or effort and lacked supporting evidence. |
Selected an appropriate and effective format to creatively communicate research findings. |
Selected an appropriate format to structure and communicate research findings. |
Needed to select a more effective format to structure and communicate research findings. |
Failed to select an appropriate format to communicate research findings. |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
___/3 |
Cited all sources of information accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. |
Cited most sources of information in proper format and documented sources to enable accuracy checking. |
Cited most sources of information improperly and provided little or no supporting documentation to check accuracy. |
Created citations which were incomplete or inaccurate, and provided no way to check the validity of the information gathered. |
Used information ethically all of the time. |
Used information ethically most of the time. |
Failed to use information ethically some of the time. |
Failed to use information ethically. |
|
___ /15 |